An Approaching Climate Disaster

The Nordonia News -

The climate changes occurring thoughout the world have been predicted and debated over the past decade. Yet, as more and more evidence emerges as to reality of climate change that implications are becoming scarier. This poses a serious issue to the emerging campaign for control of the General Assembly. The implications (detailed in the AP story below) are sobering.

By CHARLES J. HANLEY, AP Special Correspondent Charles J. Hanley, Ap Special Correspondent – Sat Feb 21, 6:57 pm ET

CAPE TOWN, South Africa – If we don't deal with climate change decisively, "what we're talking about then is extended world war," the eminent economist said.

His audience Saturday, small and elite, had been stranded here by bad weather and were talking climate. They couldn't do much about the one, but the other was squarely in their hands. And so, Lord Nicholas Stern was telling them, was the potential for mass migrations setting off mass conflict.

"Somehow we have to explain to people just how worrying that is," the British economic thinker said.

Stern, author of a major British government report detailing the cost of climate change, was one of a select group of two dozen — environment ministers, climate negotiators and experts from 16 nations — scheduled to fly to Antarctica to learn firsthand how global warming might melt its ice into the sea, raising ocean levels worldwide.

Their midnight flight was scrubbed on Friday and Saturday because of high winds on the southernmost continent, 3,000 miles from here. While waiting at their Cape Town hotel for the gusts to ease down south, chief sponsor Erik Solheim, Norway's environment minister, improvised with group exchanges over coffee and wine about the future of the planet.

"International diplomacy is all about personal relations," Solheim said. "The more people know each other, the less likely there will be misunderstandings."

Understandings will be vital in this "year of climate," as the world's nations and their negotiators count down toward a U.N. climate conference in Copenhagen in December, target date for concluding a grand new deal to replace the Kyoto Protocol — the 1997 agreement, expiring in 2012, to reduce carbon dioxide and other global-warming emissions by industrial nations.
Solheim drew together key players for the planned brief visit to Norway's Troll Research Station in East Antarctica.

Trying on polar outfits for size on Friday were China's chief climate negotiator Xie Zhenhua, veteran U.S. climate envoy Dan Reifsnyder, and environment ministers Hilary Benn of Britain and Carlos Minc Baumfeld of Brazil.

Later, at dinner, the heavyweights heard from smaller or poorer nations about the trials they face as warming disrupts climate, turns some regions drier, threatens food production in poor African nations.

Jose Endundo, environment minister of Congo, said he recently visited huge Lake Victoria in nearby Uganda, at 80,000 square kilometers (31,000 square miles) a vital source for the Nile River, and learned the lake level had dropped 3 meters (10 feet) in the past six years — a loss blamed in part on warmer temperatures and diminishing rains.

In the face of such threats, "the rich countries have to give us a helping hand," the African minister said.

But it was Stern, former chief World Bank economist, who on Saturday laid out a case to his stranded companions in sobering PowerPoint detail.

If the world's nations act responsibly, Stern said, they will achieve "zero-carbon" electricity production and zero-carbon road transport by 2050 — by replacing coal power plants with wind, solar or other energy sources that emit no carbon dioxide, and fossil fuel-burning vehicles with cars running on electric or other "clean" energy.

Then warming could be contained to a 2-degree-Celsius (3.4-degree-Fahrenheit) rise this century, he said.

But if negotiators falter, if emissions reductions are not made soon and deep, the severe climate shifts and sea-level rises projected by scientists would be "disastrous."

It would "transform where people can live," Stern said. "People would move on a massive scale. Hundreds of millions, probably billions of people would have to move if you talk about 4-, 5-, 6-degree increases" — 7 to 10 degrees Fahrenheit. And that would mean extended global conflict, "because there's no way the world can handle that kind of population move in the time period in which it would take place."

Melting ice, rising seas, dwindling lakes and war — the stranded ministers had a lot to consider. But many worried, too, that the current global economic crisis will keep governments from transforming carbon-dependent economies just now. For them, Stern offered a vision of working today on energy-efficient economies that would be more "sustainable" in the future.

"The unemployed builders of Europe should be insulating all the houses of Europe," he said.
After he spoke, Norwegian organizers announced that the forecast looked good for Stern and the rest to fly south on Sunday to further ponder the future while meeting with scientists in the forbidding vastness of Antarctica.

Response is Quick

The Capital Courier -

Labor Protests

Response was quick and direct to Prime Minister Mobley's deficit fighting plan. It is clear that there will be strong opposition to her plans. Whether this opposition is strong enough to derail the plan is unclear, yet opposition clearly exists.

In the streets of Franklin City, a massive 100,000-strong worker rally was held. The protest, mirroring those occurring in Ireland, was a clear show of force for organized labor. The protest was organized by the Franklin Workers Alliance, the nation's second largest union, which represents many public sector employees. According to press releases, the union's goal was to provide a warning shot to the prime minister that organized labor was not going to willingly let its members see their incomes cut.

"We understand the government's financial crisis and the growing economic crisis facing our nation. Yet, it is blatantly unfair to ask the men and women who serve this country to give up their financial stability. How does cutting the wages of some 300,000 workers help the economy? This may cut the deficit but will only worsen the deteriorating economic problems of our country. We will not stand by and watch our members' ability to support their families cut for the sake of the deficit."

The union's political goals are clear. Not only was this protest a warning to the current prime minister but is also a signal to the new political parties that organized labor is a force to be dealt with in the upcoming election. It has also become clear that other labor organizations, including the National Workers Union (the nation's largest union), may join the political battle.

Story: Similar protests in Ireland

Division concerning withdraw plans

On Friday, the prime minister announced her plans to begin a withdraw plan from Iraq. The goals are clearly in line with the prime minister's political philosophy and her desire to correct the growing deficit problem. Yet, it is clear that opinions within the military are divided. It is certainly true that some military officials would like to see a continuation of current operations, which are in support of the U.S. military. However, it is also clear that there is growing concern within the military community over the strain the current mission is having on their institution. Any withdraw plan will have to reconcile the divergent military opinions.

Story: U.S. also considering withdraw from Iraq

To withdraw or not to withdraw...that is a the question.

The Franklin Times -

Speaking before the outgoing General Assembly, Prime Minister Mobley laid out an ambitious legislative agenda in her final weeks as Prime Minister. Frustrated by political infighting within the coalition and a seemingly unbreakable conservative opposition to her proposals, the prime minister seems set for one final legislative battle.

Mobley's number one concern has been the economic crisis gripping the country and her address did little to move off this issue. Having failed to negotiate a compromise stimulus bill that could win approval within her broad coalition, she has turned her focus to the ballooning deficit. As tax revenues have plummeted the nation's long tradition of balanced budgets has ended.

In her address, the prime minister made it clear that a stimulus package will have to wait for the next government, but she would make one last attempt to provide sound financial footing for that next government. Highlighting her philosophical beliefs, the prime minister made it clear that budgetary cuts would not be made in the realms of healthcare, education, or public assistance programs. "To deny the programs that assist the most vulnerable in our society of their worthy financial support, would be to violate the very values of this nation - that a neighbor in need must not be ignored."

Instead of cuts in these areas, the prime minister called for cuts in the current military operations in Iraq and cuts in the pay of public sector employees. "We must draw to a close our nation's military role in Iraq. The foolish interventionist policies instituted by our last king and my predecessor have cost this nation lives and billions in needed revenue. It is time to reestablish our nation's responsible foreign and military policies." She would go on to explain that a draw down of military forces in Iraq will save billions but would, by itself, not be enough. "We must also ask our public servants to sacrifice. Following the proposed models of our European neighbors, I am proposing cutting public wages by seven percent."

It remains unclear whether this deficit fighting plan will be able to garner any legislative support in the outgoing General Assembly. It is also unclear how the current parties will respond to the plan.

The Afganistan Conflict Widens?

New York Times -
Obama Expands Missile Strikes Inside Pakistan
By MARK MAZZETTI and DAVID E. SANGER
Published: February 20, 2009

WASHINGTON — With two missile strikes over the past week, the Obama administration has expanded the covert war run by the Central Intelligence Agency inside Pakistan, attacking a militant network seeking to topple the Pakistani government.

The missile strikes on training camps run by Baitullah Mehsud represent a broadening of the American campaign inside Pakistan, which has been largely carried out by drone aircraft. Under President Bush, the United States frequently attacked militants from Al Qaeda and the Taliban involved in cross-border attacks into Afghanistan, but had stopped short of raids aimed at Mr. Mehsud and his followers, who have played less of a direct role in attacks on American troops.

The strikes are another sign that President Obama is continuing, and in some cases extending, Bush administration policy in using American spy agencies against terrorism suspects in Pakistan, as he had promised to do during his presidential campaign. At the same time, Mr. Obama has begun to scale back some of the Bush policies on the detention and interrogation of terrorism suspects, which he has criticized as counterproductive.

Mr. Mehsud was identified early last year by both American and Pakistani officials as the man who had orchestrated the assassination of Benazir Bhutto, the former prime minister and the wife of Pakistan’s current president, Asif Ali Zardari. Mr. Bush included Mr. Mehsud’s name in a classified list of militant leaders whom the C.I.A. and American commandos were authorized to capture or kill.

It is unclear why the Obama administration decided to carry out the attacks, which American and Pakistani officials said occurred last Saturday and again on Monday, hitting camps run by Mr. Mehsud’s network. The Saturday strike was aimed specifically at Mr. Mehsud, but he was not killed, according to Pakistani and American officials.

The Monday strike, officials say, was aimed at a camp run by Hakeem Ullah Mehsud, a top aide to the militant. By striking at the Mehsud network, the United States may be seeking to demonstrate to Mr. Zardari that the new administration is willing to go after the insurgents of greatest concern to the Pakistani leader.

But American officials may also be prompted by growing concern that the militant attacks are increasingly putting the civilian government of Pakistan, a nation with nuclear weapons, at risk.
For months, Pakistani military and intelligence officials have complained about Washington’s refusal to strike at Baitullah Mehsud, even while C.I.A. drones struck at Qaeda figures and leaders of the network run by Jalaluddin Haqqani, a militant leader believed responsible for a campaign of violence against American troops in Afghanistan.

According to one senior Pakistani official, Pakistan’s intelligence service on two occasions in recent months gave the United States detailed intelligence about Mr. Mehsud’s whereabouts, but said the United States had not acted on the information. Bush administration officials had charged that it was the Pakistanis who were reluctant to take on Mr. Mehsud and his network.
The strikes came after a visit to Islamabad last week by Richard C. Holbrooke, the American envoy to Pakistan and Afghanistan.

In a telephone interview on Friday, Mr. Holbrooke declined to talk about the attacks on Mr. Mehsud. The White House also declined to speak about Mr. Mehsud or the decisions that led up to the new strikes. A C.I.A. spokesman also declined to comment.

Senior Pakistani officials are scheduled to arrive in Washington next week at a time of rising tension over a declared truce between the Pakistani government and militants in the Swat region.

While the administration has not publicly criticized the Pakistanis, several American officials said in interviews in recent days that they believe appeasing the militants would only weaken Pakistan’s civilian government. Mr. Holbrooke said in the interview that Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton and others would make clear in private, and in detail, why they were so concerned about what was happening in Swat, the need to send more Pakistani forces to the west, and why the deteriorating situation in the tribal areas added to instability in Afghanistan and threats to American forces.

Past efforts to cut deals with the insurgents failed, and many administration officials believe that they ultimately weakened the Pakistani government.

But Obama administration officials face the same intractable problems that the Bush administration did in trying to prod Pakistan toward a different course. Pakistan still deploys the overwhelming majority of its troops along the Indian border, not the border with Afghanistan, and its intelligence agencies maintain shadowy links to the Taliban even as they take American funds to fight them.

Under standard policy for covert operations, the C.I.A. strikes inside Pakistan have not been publicly acknowledged either by the Obama administration or the Bush administration. Using Predators and the more heavily armed Reaper drones, the C.I.A. has carried out more than 30 strikes since last September, according to American and Pakistani officials.

The attacks have killed a number of senior Qaeda figures, including Abu Jihad al-Masri and Usama al-Kini, who is believed to have helped plan the 1998 American Embassy bombings in East Africa and last year’s bombing of the Marriott Hotel in Islamabad.

American Special Operations troops based in Afghanistan have also carried out a number of operations into Pakistan’s tribal areas since early September, when a commando raid that killed a number of militants was publicly condemned by Pakistani officials. According to a senior American military official, the commando missions since September have been primarily to gather intelligence.

The meetings hosted by the Obama administration next week will include senior officials from both Pakistan and Afghanistan; Mrs. Clinton is to hold a rare joint meeting on Thursday with foreign ministers from the two countries. Also, Gen. Ashfaq Parvez Kayani, the Pakistani Army chief, will meet with Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates and Adm. Mike Mullen, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. Lt. Gen Ahmed Shuja Pasha, the head of Pakistan’s military spy service, will accompany General Kayani.

Stimulus Plan Passes in the United States

The Franklin Times -

The United States Congress passed and President Obama signed a massive stimulus bill this week. The bill is designed to provide an economic boost for the sagging U.S. economy. The U.S. economy, sinking deeper into recession, is now facing one of the worst economic crises since the Great Depression. The economic figures are staggering: unemployment is rising, production levels are falling, corporate profits are rapidly sinking, as are home prices. In addition, the Dow Jones has reached a six year low and a number of financial institutions are at risk of going under.

With the Franklin economy closely tied to the faltering economies of the U.S. and Canada, it becomes clear that the political parties must offer some economic solutions. The recent Wallup Poll revealed that the economy has emerged as the number one issue in this election. But at the same time the poll revealed that many voters know little about their electoral choices. Hopefully, as the campaign progresses this problem will be rectified.

Stimulus Details: 2009 Stimulus Bill
How should trade and NAFTA be altered
Obama economic trip to Canada

Wallup Poll 2/21/09

FNS (Franklin News Service) - The first Wallup Poll was released this morning

If the election were held today, who would you support?

TPP 10%
RKP 5%
MDP 1%
FP 1%
MP 1%
Don't know/Don't know enough 82%


What do you consider the top issue in the 2009 election?

Economy 50%
Iraq/War on Terror 15%
Education 10%
Healthcare 10%
Other 15%


Should the Franklin States remove its military forces from Iraq?

Yes 43%
No 37%
Don't Know/No Opinion 20%


Should the Franklin States send military forces to Afghanistan?

Yes 38%
No 42%
Don't Know/No Opinion 20%


Should the General Assembly pass a stimulus plan to help the economy?

Yes 53%
No 30%
Don't Know/No Opinion 17%

What's in a Name?

The Nordonia News -
Editorial Board

The old question goes, "what's in a name?" The answer, at least for this election cycle, is nothing. The NEC this afternoon announced the approval of five parties to compete in the upcoming General Assembly elections. Yet, little was revealed about the parties themselves. The five parties have seemingly adopted cryptic names leaving little clue as to where they stand on the major issues facing our nation. The names do not even reveal the ideological views of the parties. We have been given a Fanatical Party, yet know nothing of their "fanatical" beliefs. We were given a MAD Party, yet have no clue as to the root of their anger. There is a strangely named MCFARLAND Party. What is the message here? Team Papi? Color me confused. And finally, we have a ReganKnights Party. Does borrowing the name of an American president really speak of national pride? This board waits with baited breath.

Party Names by Country

NEC Announcment

The Capital Courier -

In an afternoon press conference, NEC Chairman J. McFarland announced that his agency had processed and approved the application of five political parties for the 2009 General Assembly election cycle. Chairman McFarland detailed that the five approved parties are the FP, MP, MDP, RKP, and TPP. Besides detailing the approved names, the Chairman also clarified the campaign funding rules and regulations. Parties will become eligible for their public campaign funds once they poll over 5% in the national Wallup Poll. The first poll results are expected later this week. Finally, the press conference ended with the prediction that the parties would be launching campaign websites in the coming days.

Pirate Attack

The Franklin Times -

A Franklin oil tanker was seized by pirates off the Somali coast early this morning. The seizure of the tanker marks the first time a Franklin vessel has been captured in this dangerous part of the world. While the incident marks the first Franklin connection, it by no means represents the first pirate attack in these waters. Pirates, based on the Somali coast, have been engaged in a quickly expanding enterprise of capturing and ransoming sea-going vessels.

Initial reports indicate that twenty-one crew members were also seized but there are no indications as to their well being. This poses an interesting foreign policy question for the newly formed political parties. What if anything can be done to reduce this threat?

http://www.foreignpolicy.com/story/cms.php?story_id=4682

Stimulus Bill Passes House

House Passes Obama Stimulus Package
Bill Gets No GOP Votes; Senate Will Now Debate Its Version

By Paul KaneWashington Post Staff Writer Thursday, January 29, 2009; Page A01

The House approved an $819 billion stimulus package on a near party-line vote yesterday, a plan breathtaking in size and scope that President Obama hopes to make the cornerstone of his efforts to resuscitate the staggering economy.

Obama engaged in an all-out lobbying push for the bill, which is among the most expensive pieces of legislation ever to move through Congress, and marked the biggest victory of his presidency a little more than a week into his term. He will now turn his attention to the Senate, where Democrats are scheduled to begin debate on the measure on Monday and the price tag is likely to reach $900 billion.

Larger than the combined total cost of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan so far, the two-year stimulus plan would provide up to $1,000 per year in tax relief for most families, dramatically increase funding for alternative energy production, and direct more than $300 billion in aid to states to help rebuild schools, provide health care to the poor and reconstruct highways and bridges.

But Obama's personal salesmanship effort failed to secure a single Republican supporter for the spending plan, which passed on a 244 to 188 vote. Just a day after the president spent more than an hour behind closed doors at the Capitol seeking their support, all 177 House Republicans opposed the measure, arguing that it would spend hundreds of billions of dollars on initiatives that would do little to stimulate the economy. Eleven Democrats opposed the bill.
In a statement issued after the early evening vote, Obama said he was "grateful" for the House action.

"There are many numbers in this plan," he said in the statement. "But out of all these numbers, there is one that matters most to me: This recovery plan will save or create more than 3 million new jobs over the next few years."

While Obama made no mention of the unanimous Republican opposition, a top adviser immediately warned of the political fallout GOP lawmakers could face from constituents struggling in tough economic times.

"There will be people in districts all over the country that will wonder why, when there's a good bill to get the economy moving again, while we still seem to be playing political gotcha," White House press secretary Robert Gibbs said in an interview.

Some moderate Republicans who opposed the bill left open the chance of supporting the final version if the White House and Senate address their concerns about spending. And Democrats remain hopeful of securing a more bipartisan result in the Senate, where committee action has driven up the cost as the amount of tax relief has increased, something Republicans have demanded before they will consider offering their support.

Washington Post - House Passes Bill
New York Times - How They Voted
Pittsburgh Post-Gazette - Oppose the bill at your peril
Wall Street Journal - What's in this thing

Should equality be the goal?

The Capital Courier -

Within weeks the Supreme Judicial Court is expected to rule on the issue of pay equity. The case in question specifically deals with pay discrimination based on gender. The case is very similar to the Ledbetter case heard by the Supreme Court of the United States in 2007. At question is whether employees can sue their employers for pay discrimination after the statute of limitations has been exhausted.

The broader issue revolves around the question of what role the government should play in the crusade of gender equality when it comes to compensation. Should government become involved in this discrimination issue or is this something that should be corrected by the market place? Furthermore, will allowing employees to sue for pay discrimination open a Pandora's box of lawsuits that will further cripple the struggling economy? It is surely an economic and civil rights debate that will continue for some time.

AP - The US Congress recently dealt with a similar matter.

Afghanistan: Our Problem?

The Franklin Times -

As the conflict in Afghanistan enters its eighth year it is becoming clearer and clearer that the western world is failing. One would be hard pressed to look at this war-torn nation and conclude that progress is being made or that it is even possible. This is a land that has defeated every foreign force that has tried to control or change it.

It is a land governed by religious extremism, tribalism, warlords, and drug smugglers. Since bringing Karzai to power after the fall of the Taliban government, the United States has been unable to extend his power. Many analysts agree that while President of Afghanistan in name, Karzai's true power does not extend outside the capital of Kabul.

In complicate matters, the Taliban has reemerged. Supported by sympathetic Pashtuns in Pakistan's ungovernable frontier, this religious movement has reasserted its control over much of the countryside and drug trade. This has led to increasing violence throughout the country and has threatened to prevent the creation of a stable Afghanistan.

In response to these changing dynamics, the United States is reevaluating its military strategy in the country. President Obama and Defense Sec. Gates are looking to expand the military operation and increase the number of troops in country. NATO, which officially has military command of all international forces, is growing wary of the extended military involvement.

So, now the question for our nation is straightforward: does Franklin commit military forces to Afghanistan?

AP - Gates testifies before Congress

USA Today Editorial - Repeating Past Mistakes?

Foreign Policy Debates

The Capital Courier -

World events over the past month point to crucial self-defining issues which this nation must wrestle with. Over the past three weeks, Israelis and Palestinians have been engaged in savage war with one another. With Hamas firing rockets into civilian centers within Israel, and the Israeli Defense Forces responding with military operations that have killed over 1200 Palestinians, it becomes clear that the Middle East peace process is once again stalled. As the election cycle develops it is hoped by this newspaper's editorial staff that the parties will develop and unveil comprehensive policies for dealing with Mid-East violence. This newspaper understands our nation's role will be limited, but that does not mean we cannot have a voice. Our longstanding friendship with the United States and Europe creates a platform from which to be heard. Furthermore, our own nation's sizable Jewish and Muslim populations must see engagement in this issue.

Yet, our relationship with the United States must not end with the Israeli-Palestinian issue. Our neighbor to the south looks to history, as it inaugurates its first African American president. The Presidency of Barack Obama promises to bring profound change within the U.S. and in how it deals with the rest of the world. Franklin must use this opportunity to further define our relationship with our neighbor. Among the many issues that must be resolved is our mutual cooperation in the war on terror. It is clear that we must work closely in this global struggle against radical ideologies built on hate and domination. Yet, we must also protect and guard our nation's fledgling democracy and commitment to the rule of law. Recently, the Ministry of Homeland Security and the Ministry of Defense released previously classified reports detailing Franklin's involvement in the interrogation of suspected terrorists. While many aspects of this cooperation remain unknown it has become clear that, at least at some level, Franklin intelligence and military personnel were engaged in renditions and "harsh interrogations" of suspected terrorists. As the election proceeds, the political parties need to explain their visions of our nation's character and how they would wage this global war on terror.

Economic Disaster?

The Franklin Times -

"The financial and economic crash of 2008, the worst in over 75 years, is a major geopolitical setback for the west...A brutal recession is unfolding in the United States, Europe, and probably Japan - a recession likely to be more harmful than the slump of 1981-82. The current financial crisis has deeply frightened consumers and businesses, and in response they have sharply retrenched. In addition, the usual recovery tools used by governments - monetary and fiscal stimuli - will be relatively ineffective under the circumstances" (Altman, 2009). These mark the opening lines of Roger C. Altman's recent essay in Foreign Affairs. The essay's dire forecasts are nothing new, but they do point to the dominant issue in the upcoming General Assembly elections - the economy.

Franklin's economy, like those of its counterparts in the western world, is faltering. The Treasury Ministry and National Bank are reporting sobering numbers as of late. The nation has officially moved into recession territory, with Franklin's GDP beginning to contract in the third quarter of 2008 and forecasted to drop dramatically in the fourth quarter - nearly five percent. Unemployment is on the rise, reaching a 17 year high of 7.8%. Home values have fallen by nearly 20%, and investment assets have fallen 25%. The Franklin Stock Exchange has seen its value drop nearly 40% percent in a single year. The nation's financial system is in shambles and with heavy ties to U.S. firms many economists fear the nation's entire credit market will completely freeze. Compounding problems are plummeting oil prices. Economic crisis in the United States has caused a severe drop in oil demand. As a result, the nation's number one export is suffering. Oil prices have fallen by some $110 per barrel in only six months (from a high of $150 to the current level of $40).

This financial and economic crisis is now leading to fiscal consequences. The government's tax base is drying up. Climbing unemployment and stagnant wages are reducing income tax receipts. Corporations throughout the country are reporting staggering loses reducing the tax base even more. Place falling oil prices on top of this disaster only serves to illustrate the fiscal straights the nation faces. Just last Spring, the Treasury was reporting approaching budget deficits. These projections have now ballooned. The nation, which had one prided itself on sound fiscal polices and budget surpluses, faces the worst fiscal situation since the 1930s.

With these issues in mind, it becomes clear that the new political parties will have to make the economy their priority. The nation's voters are growing nervous and are in need of an economic plan to turn this nation around.

New Election Season Opens

NEC Chairman McFarland Announcement:

The nation's 3rd General Assembly Election cycle has now begun. Prime Minister Mobley has called for a national election, to fill the 350 legislative seats of the 3rd General Assembly, to be held on March 28 and 29, 2009. National Election Commission (NEC) Chairman, James McFarland announced today that his agency, responsible for overseeing all Franklin States' elections, will begin accepting party applications. For a political party to appear on a national ballot it must be recognized by the Election Commission. Once a party has been recognized by the NEC it is eligible for public finance campaign funds. These funds become available once the party polls over 5% nationally.

Chairman McFarland also announced the commission will continue its effort to integrate the internet as much as possible in the electoral effort (recent estimates show that as much as 80% of the Franklin population possesses internet access). In line with this philosophy, the party applications must be submitted electronically. For the application process, prospective political parties should simply comment to this blog post with a party name and leadership list.

Campaigns, once recognized, should make it a habit of reading and commenting on the national blog. The NEC's blog covers all aspects of international and national headlines related to the election. Frequent use of its resources have been critical in elections past.

Government Announced

King Guy affirmed the creation of the 2nd Democratic Government in the nation's history. Prime Minister Cody Gentry (Leader of the LLP) also announced the coalition partners and his cabinet ministers. The Center-Left Coalition of the LLP, LFP, and FMP will surely guide the country into a different direction than the Sexton Government. However, only time will tell whether or not the coalition has enough votes and cohesion to pass the LLP's aggressive legislative agenda.

The Government Ministers:

Prime Minister Cody Gentry
Deputy Prime Minister Molly Mobley
Foreign Minister Hannah Myers
Defense Minister Brittni Woods
Treasury Minister Jordan Roberts
Justice Minister David Lindholm
Homeland Minister Chantel Roberson
Commerce and Trade Minister Brittany Lawhorn
Health Minister Tyler Fields
Environmental Minister Karin Taylor
Education Minister Leann Lanzarotta
Agricultural and Mining Minister Rachel Isaacs
Speaker of the National Assembly Rachel Sams

Election Analysis

The Franklin Times -

The election is over and the analysis game has begun. What did the 2008 election reveal?

1) The Power of Organization: If the 2008 election proved anything, it was that the parties who were most committed to organization and campaign spending performed better than the parties who didn't. The LLP and the FDRP ran the most organized and disciplined campaigns, explaining why they garnered almost half of all votes cast.

2) The unpopularity of the war: exit polls showed a common theme throughout the eastern states of the nation, massive disapproval of the military operations in Iraq. PM Sexton's commitment to maintaining troops in Iraq certainly cost the conservatives seats. Sexton's FCP had been surprising competitive in many urban areas in 2007, but another year of war fatigue created an environment in which the FCP heir the FDRP was unable to hold swing urban seats.

3) The rise of the Left: the three leftist parties (the LLP, LFP, and the FMP) were able to dominate in the heavily populated east erasing many swing seats held by conservative members. These three parties will constitute 58% of the new national assembly, showing strong support for the left-of-center policies.

4) The power of the FDRP: it is clear that if LLP Party Leader Gentry is able to form a leftist coalition, the FDRP will become the lead opposition party. The FDRP dominated in the western states and clearly emerges as the most powerful conservative party. Yet, the lack of other active conservative parties may have hurt the FDRP's ability to control the political debate. With three viable leftist parties, the political debate seemed to favor their views with the FDRP pushed into a voice in the wilderness.

5) The power of the Internet: those parties most active in posting to the NEC and UPA blog were more successful on election day. It is clear that many voters (especially young voters) receive political news and views through the Internet. Those parties who utilized this resource saw greater success.

Election Results

Election Results

Bennett:

District Seats:
FDRP: 3
FHSRP: 1
JRP: 1

Vote Percentage: 7 At Large Seats: Seats Won in ( )

FDRP 51% (4)
FHSRP: 20% (1)
JRP: 15% (1)
FMP: 10% (1)
LLP: 2%
LFP: 1%
ALP: 1%

Capital State:

District Seats:

LLP: 2
LFP: 2
FMP: 1

Vote Percentage: 25 At Large Seats: Seats Won in ( )

LLP: 37% (9)
LFP 23% (6)
FMP: 15% (4)
ALP: 5% (1)
FHSRP: 5% (1)
FDRP: 10% (3)
JRP: 5% (1)

Conover:

District Seats:
LLP: 3
LFP: 1
FMP: 1

Vote Percentage: 37 At Large Seats: Seats Won in ( )

LLP: 39% (14)
LFP: 20% (7)
FMP: 15% (6)
FDRP: 11% (4)
FHSRP: 10% (4)
JRP: 3% (1)
ALP: 2% (1)

Gerke:

District Seats:

FDRP: 3
FHSRP: 1
JRP: 1

Voter Percentage: 7 At Large Seats: Seats Won in ( )

FDRP: 36% (3)
FHSRP: 24% (2)
JRP: 10% (1)
ALP: 10% (1)
FMP: 7%
LLP: 7%
LFP: 6%

Hampton:

District Seats:

FDRP: 2
FHSRP: 1
ALP: 1
FMP: 1

Voter Percentage: 10 At Large Seats: Seats Won in ( )

FDRP: 30% (3)
JRP: 20% (2)
FHSRP: 15% (1)
ALP: 10% (1)
FMP: 10% (1)
LLP: 8% (1)
LFP: 7% (1)

Hunter:

District Seats:

FDRP: 3
FHSRP: 1
ALP: 1

Voter Percentage: 7 At Large Seats: Seats Won in ( )

FDRP: 37% (3)
FHSRP: 23% (2)
JRP: 10% (1)
ALP: 10% (1)
LLP: 7%
LFP: 7%
FMP: 6%

Huron:

District Seats:

FMP: 3
LLP: 1
FDRP: 1

Voter Percentage: 17 At Large Seats: Seats Won in ( )

FMP: 24% (4)
LLP: 23% (4)
LFP: 17% (3)
ALP: 16% (3)
FHSRP: 15% (3)
FDRP: 3%
JRP: 2%

Irondequiot:

District Seats:

LLP: 2
LFP: 2
FDRP: 1

Voter Percentage: 63 At Large Seats: Seats Won in ( )

LLP: 28% (18)
LFP: 27% (17)
FMP: 15% (9)
FDRP: 10% (6)
FHSRP: 10% (6)
ALP: 6% (4)
JRP: 4% (3)

North Winsota:

District Seats:

FMP: 3
LLP: 1
LFP: 1

Voter Percentage: 21 At Large Seats: Seats Won in ( )

LLP: 25% (5)
FDRP: 23% (5)
LFP: 20% (4)
FMP: 18% (4)
FHSRP: 8% (2)
JRP: 4% (1)
ALP: 2%

Schenck:

District Seats:

LLP: 2
LFP: 2
FDRP: 1

Voter Percentage: 15 At Large Seats: Seats Won in ( )

LLP: 23% (3)
FDRP: 20% (3)
LFP: 17% (3)
FMP: 15% (2)
FHSRP: 15% (2)
JRP: 7% (1)
ALP: 3% (1)

South Winsota:

District Seats:

LLP: 2
LFP: 2
FDRP: 1

Voter Percentage: 23 At Large Seats: Seats Won in ( )

LLP: 30% (7)
FDRP: 25% (6)
FMP: 15% (4)
FHSRP: 15% (3)
LFP: 5% (1)
JRP: 5% (1)
ALP: 5% (1)

The Lakes:

District Seats:

FDRP: 3
LLP: 1
LFP: 1

Voter Percentage: 10 At Large Seats: Seats Won in ( )

FDRP: 30% (3)
FHSRP: 16% (2)
FMP: 14% (1)
ALP: 12% (1)
LLP: 11% (1)
LFP: 9% (1)
JRP: 8% (1)

Wayne:

District Seats:

LLP: 1
LFP: 2
FDRP: 2

Voter Percentage: 43 At Large Seats: Seats Won in ( )

LLP: 35% (15)
FDRP: 19% (8)
LFP: 16% (7)
FMP: 14% (6)
JRP: 10% (4)
FHSRP: 6% (3)
ALP: 1%

Party Breakdown:

LLP: 15 District Seats + 77 At Large Seats; Total Seats: 92 – 26.28%
FDRP: 20 District Seats + 51 At Large Seats: Total Seats: 71 – 20.28%
LFP: 13 District Seats + 50 At Large Seats: Total Seats: 63 – 18%
FMP: 9 District Seats + 42 At Large Seats: Total Seats: 51 – 14.57%
FHSRP: 4 District Seats + 32 At Large Seats: Total Seats: 36 – 10.28%
JRP: 2 District Seats + 18 At Large Seats: Total Seats: 20 – 5.7%
ALP: 2 District Seats + 15 At Large Seats: Total Seats: 17 – 4.85%

Governing Coalition Must Control at least 176 Seats or 50.29%

Election Results:The Literally Liberal Party has captured the most seats in the National Assembly. The LLP will control 92 seats in the 350 seat chamber or 26.28%.

King Guy has now charged the Literally Liberal Party Leader, Mr. Cody Gentry with the authority to form a coalition government. Mr. Gentry and his party are now free to enter into negotiations with any of the other political parties as they attempt to form a working coalition that controls at least 176 seats in the National Assembly.

If such an attempt fails, the FDRP, which finished in 2nd place, will be given authority to form a coalition.

The following positions must be filled:

Prime Minister:
Deputy Prime Minister:
Foreign Minister:
Defense Minister:
Treasury Minister:
Justice Minister:
Homeland Minister:
Commerce and Trade Minister:
Health Minister:
Education Minister:
Environmental Minister:
Agricultural and Mining Minister:
Speaker of the National Assembly:

Early Election Projections

The Franklin Times -

The National Elections Commission is reporting heavy voter turnout throughout the country. The NEC is estimating a national turnout of 74%. Turnout has been heaviest in the western states, especially Bennett, and in the large urban areas of Capital State, Conover, Wayne, and Irondequiot.

Early projections show strong support for the FDRP, LLP, LFP, and FMP. The race remains too close to call but projections for the District Seats (65 of the 350 seats in the National Assembly) show:

FDRP capturing 20 District Seats
LLP capturing 15 District Seats
LFP capturing 13 District Seats
FMP capturing 9 District Seats
FHSRP Party capturing 4 District Seats
JRP Party capturing 2 District Seats
ALP Party capturing 2 District Seats

While winning District Seats is important, it is still uncertain if strength in these races will translate into big wins in the race for the At Large Seats (285 of the 350 seats in the National Assembly) which are based on the vote percentage each party receives within each individual state. Control of the National Assembly will depend on a party or coalition controlling at least 176 of the 350 seats.

Issues and Endorsements

The National Press Association invites all parties to make a final appeal to voters through the NEC blog. The NPA asks all parties to simply post a message...


The NPA also invites all parties to check out the updated interest group endorsement page...
http://mcpedia.pbwiki.com/Franklin-Interest-Groups

Organization...

The Capital Courier -

With the election days away, the parties have now turned to their bases. In the closing days of the campaign, political parties look to their voter base and to turnout. Ads are currently running in all states, party operatives and consultants are working overtime, and parties are spending millions of dollars. However, it appears that two races are quickly developing. The first race is between the select parties who have shown the organization, message, and voter base to emerge as the largest vote getter. This race is one of ideology. On the left, the LLP and LFP (and to a lesser extent the FMP) are battling for supremacy. On the right, the FDR Party, despite tough attacks from labor appears to have weathered the storm. It is unlikely any party will emerge with a majority of seats in the National Assembly, but the top vote getter will control the coalition formation process. A second race seems to have developed between the more minor parties (ALP, FMP, JRP, FHSRP). While these parties have seen their chances of winning the most seats slip away they may still possess great power after the election. If these minor parties win enough seats they can position themselves as attractive coalition partners.

Massive Rallies Held...Displaying their organizational strength, the LLP and the FRD Party held massive rallies today. In the state of Conover, the LLP drew a crowd of 60,000 supporters to see the LLP Leader Cody Gentry speak with the leaders of the National Workers Union and the Franklin Workers Alliance. In the state of Wayne, where polling has the FDRP outperforming expectations, a crowd of 65,000 gathered to see the entire party leadership.

Newspaper Endorsements...

Newspaper Endorsements:

The Nordonia News: The FDR Party - "This party represents the clear vision of a proper conservative party by embracing the notion that only through free choice can a society reach greatness."

The Franklin Times: Literally Liberal Party- "The Literally Liberal Party has run both a strong and flawed campaign, but has showcased the seriousness needed for a ruling party. Its commitment to social justice and to ending the flawed foreign policy of misguided intervention makes it the best choice."

The Capital Courier: Love and Freedom Party - "As is all too often the trend in western democracies, the political debate has been dominated by left and right parties. Yet, Franklin has another option that reflects the only real chance to unify our nation. That choice, which we endorse, is to take the moderate road."

Labor Endorses...

The Franklin Times -

The National Workers Union announced this afternoon its full endorsement of the Literally Liberal Party. After yesterday's closed door meeting between NWU and LLP leaders, the nation's largest labor organization stated that, "The Literally Liberal Party has demonstrated a clear connection and commitment with Franklin's working class. The union will dedicate our membership and money to supporting this great party in the upcoming election." This endorsement represents a major boost for the LLP as it looks to separate itself from the other leftist parties. The NWU also announced it was beginning an aggressive ad campaign against what it referred to as the "unfair trade" policies advocated by conservative parties.

In a late evening press release, the Franklin Workers Alliance (the nation's second largest labor union) announced its full endorsement of the Literally Liberal Party. Citing the party's support for workers’ rights, the Alliance stated, "the Literally Liberal Party represents the only real chance we have for saving Franklin's jobs and stopping the injustice represented by the money driven free traders." This represents a political victory for the LLP, which now has been endorsed by the two major labor organizations.

The Campaign Wraps Up

The Franklin Times -

Less than a week remains in the National Assembly campaign and it appears as if most voters have made up their minds. There are few "game-changing" moments left.

Some potential changing events:

1) party performance in the national debate - a strong or weak performance in this debate setting could win or lose votes for the parties.
2) key electoral endorsements - a key endorsement by an interest group or national figure could swing votes in a party's favor.
3) voter organization - the party with the better ground game is more likely to turn out their voters on election day.

The Franklin Times political analysis of campaign spending and investment shows that the LLP is the most organized. The LLP has established political headquarters in every state and is clearly targeting its natural voter base in the country's urban areas. However, there is sizable evidence that the party is attempting to appeal to white-collar suburban voters who have turned against the War in Iraq and are nervous about the economy. The FDRP also shows signs of organization especially in the western half of the country. Yet in NEC reports only two parties submitted their final campaign spending amounts meaning many parties allowed their campaign funds to go to waste.

Wallup National Poll

If the election were held today, who would you support?

LLP: 22%
LFP: 20%
FMP: 12%
ALP: 5%
FHSRP: 7%
JRP: 6%
FDRP: 24%
Undecided: 4%

Last Leg

The Franklin Times - (editorial)

The campaign now enters its last leg with less than two weeks before voters go to the polls. With so little time left, many questions remain unanswered. Will the FDRP continue to dominate the right? Will a single party emerge dominant on the left? Will Prime Minister Sexton and Deputy Prime Minister McDaniel choose to endorse a party? Will the remaining interest groups endorse or simply forgo this election? What issue will weigh heaviest in the minds of voters? The answers to these questions will surely guide the electoral results.
Yet, we at the nation's widest read newspaper can only sit back and shake our heads. The 2007 election was characterized by fierce competition and a true battle of ideas. There was a general sense that parties wanted to govern and move the nation forward. Unfortunately, this campaign has lacked such energy. Only a few parties have actively attempted to engage the voters. Only a few parties have actively pursued votes. Only a few parties have specifically spelled out their plan for this nation. Our nation is new to the democratic process, and perhaps this simply reflects a natural pattern in democracies. Yet, we worry that the less than stellar electoral effort will lead to depressed voter turnout. It is clear that many electoral analysts believe the race is already over for many parties. For some parties it simply is too late to build up effective electoral infrastructure for a national campaign. What have the parties wrought?

Election News

NEC Announcements:

Final campaign spending reports due 5/8/08. If not submited to the NEC Chairman, Jim McFarland by the close of business on Thursday, parties will forfeit all remaining funds.

Technological issues continue to hamper the NEC in many urban states. Election day will now be held on Wednesday, May 14th with early voting starting May 11th.

Nationally televised election debate will be held May 12th and 13th. All political parties are invited to participate. Debate rules will be distributed on May 7th.

The Issues

The Franklin Times -

In an effort to reach more voters, our paper has decided to introduce a new issues feature. The concept is simple, our paper will pose a variety of policy questions and simply invite the parties to answer the questions directly through the NEC blog. Without further ado...

1) In the 2007 campaign, FCP leader and current Prime Minister Brent Sexton promised to continue Franklin's membership in the North American Free Trade Agreement. After a heated debate in the National Assembly membership was extended. In light of increasing unemployment, should the Franklin States of America continue its membership in NAFTA?

2) A recent report issued by the National Research Council criticized the current state of the national educational system and recommended legislative reforms modeled after the United State's No Child Left Behind Act. Does your party support such reforms?

3) Recent reports have shown a growing number of Franklin citizens cannot afford heathcare. What role should the government play in providing healthcare for all citizens?

Wallup National Poll

The Capital Courier -

The Wallup National Poll (4/27/08)

If the election were held today, which political party would you support?

LLP 21%
LFP 23%
FMP 15%
ALP 4%
FHSRP 4%
JRP 4%
FDRP 26%
Undecided 3%

Poll Analysis: We notice three large trends. 1) For the fifth straight poll, the three parties of the left have gained in voter support. 2) Undecided has fallen dramatically in the last week with all breaking for the leftist parties. 3) The right's support has remained static with the FDRP dominating. Many conservative voters voice frustration over the campaign. Many complain of not seeing viable options. Many are beginning to question the commitment of these parties to conservative principles: free trade, conservative views on social issues, low taxes, and an aggressive foreign policy.

Excitement on the Left

The Capital Courier -

In recent weeks the campaign has finally taken off. Many parties are actively campaigning throughout the nation as election day draws closer. Yet, much of the activity seems to be centered on the left side of the political spectrum. Three parties, the LLP, LFP, and FMP are all competing fiercely for votes. All three have developed policies and promoted sound bites that show they are all interested in competing for the political left. It remains unclear which party will emerge dominate come election day.

Some political analysts point to positive and negative aspects of this fierce competition. "On one hand, there is a fear that such competition could split up the left leaving it fractured and divided. However, it is also clear that the left is where all the excitement is," explained Trevor Gilead, political science professor at Franklin National University. Many analysts are not certain how large the left leaning base is or how large it could grow. The left's strength is usually made up of union members, minority groups, the young, and liberal upper middle class voters. Big issues driving these voters include opposition to the Iraq War, lukewarm support for free trade, increased government funding for social welfare programs, environmental protection, and support for socially liberal policies. The weakening state of the economy and current state of healthcare and education seem to favor these parties if they adopt the right policies.

The Environmental Protection Council Endorses

The Franklin Times -

Eric Greene, President of the Environmental Protection Council, announced the EPC endorsement for the upcoming National Assembly elections. "We were pleased to hear from many of the parties competing in this election. The Council was impressed with the environmental policies and plans laid out and the willingness of political leaders to directly address our organization. With this in mind, and after careful consideration, the executive committee with the support of our members is pleased to endorse the FMP and the LLP." Greene went on to explain that while many parties seemed generally committed to environmental issues, these two parties seemed to possess the true political will to accomplish necessary reforms.

NEC Updates

Wallup Tracking Poll (4/20/08):

If the election were held today, who would you support?
LLP - 17%
LFP - 19%
FMP - 13%
ALP - 4%
FHSRP - 4%
JRP - 4%
FDRP - 27%
Unsure - 12%

What is the top issue in the election?
Economy 47%
Iraq/Terrorism 12%
Healthcare 12%
Education 5%

The National Election Commission announced that the 2nd round of campaign spending reports are to be submitted by Thursday, April 24th.

The Environmental Movement

The Franklin Times -

The Environmental Protection Council (EPC), one of the certified interest groups, has announced its annual national convention will be held on Wednesday, April 23rd. It is inviting representatives from the seven political parties to speak at its convention. Any party interested in speaking is to reply by April 23rd with an attached speech transcript. "We hope all the parties will attend and inform our members of their plans to protect and defend our precious environment," said Eric Greene, President of EPC.

Budget Deficit

The Capital Courier -

Budget Deficit Hits High

The Royal Treasurer announced today that the nation's budget deficit has hit a new record. The current national budget shows a deficit of $42 billion dollars. When asked to explain, Michael Bradburn responded, "Simply put: we spent more money than we took in. No matter, let the democratic revolutionaries solve the problem." It is unclear how this financial situation will play out, but it is hoped parties will explain their views.

Its the economy stupid?

The Franklin Times -

The Free Market Association, a collection of business owners and supporters of free trade, announced today it will endorse a single political party on Friday, April 25th. In a press release, the FMA, stated that the economic stances of many parties remain unclear and confusing. "Many of the parties have offered only vague economic policies and have utterly failed in providing clear cut statements. Do these parties believe in free trade or protectionism? Do they favor progressive or flat taxes? Do they support minimum wage laws? These are questions for which our members must have answers." This organization, according to its mission's statement, believes that free market economics and free trade that the only proper means by which a nation can enjoy a healthy economy. It also states a strong distrust and dislike for government intrusion and high tax policies. It invites all parties to express their clear economic policies by responding directly to this story and hopes parties will debate the many pressing economic issues facing the Franklin States of America.

Leaders of the NWU and FWA released a joint press release late this afternoon encouraging the pro-worker and pro-labor parties to participate in the FMA economic online debate. "We hope that parties representing the working man will make their voices known in this debate. Any party hoping for labor's support in the upcoming election has a duty to engage and challenge radical free marketers who care more for profit than they do the well being of their fellow citizens."

Headlines 4/12/08

The Franklin Times -

Wallup Poll 4/12/08

If the election were held today who would you support?

LLP - 17%
LFP - 17%
FMP - 13%
ALP - 6%
FHSRP - 6%
JRP - 6%
FDRP - 23%
Unsure - 12%

Results show three parties in political trouble with their voter support falling.

Royal Veterans Association Endorses

Citing the party's stance on the Iraq War, the RVA announced its endorsement of the FDRP. This is a politically powerful endorsement within the conservative community. The RVA brings to the campaign a large membership and very committed voters.

Labor "loves" the Love and Freedom Party

The countries two major labor unions both issued statements of support for the Love and Freedom Party. While falling short of a complete endorsement both unions stated their appreciation of the LFP's support during the unions' recent rallies and marches.

Interest Group Updates

The Franklin Times -

EPC Convention Approaches -

Final preparations are being made for the annual national convention of the Environment Protection Council (EPC), which is being held in South Winsota's capital, Milwaukee. Delegates from around the F.S.A. will be in attendance at the meeting, which because of the upcoming election has taken on new significance. Eric Greene, President of EPC, described how the election has increased the power and influence his group has. "Now that political parties have to compete for power they need the people," He explained, "as of now five of the major parties are planning on addressing our delegation; presenting their environmental platforms. It is clear that an endorsement from our organization will go a long way to assuring electoral victory in May."

Gun Gala -

Today thousands of gun owners met at the Gun Gala, the largest gun show held in Franklin. The annual event represents not only a prime opportunity for gun buyers and sellers to do business, but also represents a political event. "As our nation moves into its democratic future, it is critically important that our government respect the rights of gun owners," explained Greg Godsen, President of the Franklin Rifle Association (FRA). Many political analysts agree that gun rights will not play a pivotal role in the 2008 election, but this interest group and its supporters could play crucial roles in key States. "This will force many political parties to develop a delicate balancing act," stated Kyle Smithson, a political analyst. Gun ownership is extremely high in the western States, while gun control remains a popular issue in urban areas of the East.

Labor March

The Franklin Times -

The streets of Bordeaux, Irondequiot were filled with the supporters of organized labor today, as the National Workers Union organized a massive show of force. A spokesman for the NWU estimated the crowd number to be 30,000. This number was confirmed by local law enforcement. The march, according to the NWU spokesman, was held to demonstrate the raw strength of their organization and of the labor movement in general.

"It is critically important for our nation and our nation's political parties to realize the will and determination of Franklin workers," explained John Taylor (NWU President in Irondequiot), "Our members will support any party that fights for the common man against corporations driven only by a pursuit for higher profits. We need a government that will stop the outsourcing of Franklin jobs and is willing to fight and protect Franklin's industries."

Irondequiot, the most populous of the Franklin States, is a sympathetic host. This State and its capital, Bordeaux, have lost 70,000 manufacturing jobs in the last five years. A recent Wallup poll also found that 70% of all Irondequiot residents believe the economy is the number one issue.

A Quiet Election

The Capital Courier - Editorial

We understand that our nation is new to the democratic process and that our political parties are new to the game, but we are left to wonder where the political debate is? This editorial board has been utterly unimpressed with the ability of our parties to actively engage each other in any substantive political debate. The parties are too concerned about playing it safe in the closing days of the campaign and our democracy is worse for it.We know there exists real and substantive differences between the parties. It is clear by simply visiting the parties' websites that they differ on issues ranging from economics, to social programs, to Iraq.

Yet, despite these differences, parties are not criticizing the weaknesses of their opponent's policies. We are not calling for nasty name calling or personal attack ads but we are calling for intelligent political debate on the issues.

So our call goes out: parties wake up! Our democracy needs more than polished campaign slogans and careful electoral strategies. Our nation and voters need a political debate reflective of our diverse opinions and backgrounds. Parties engaged in honest debate will not be punished by the voters but admired for their ability to present clear and coherent policy alternatives.

World Affairs Council Endorses LLP

The Franklin Times -

In an early morning press conference, the President of the World Affairs Council, Jake Briggins, announced his groups formal endorsement of the LLP. "The LLP is the only party promising to end the failed policy in Iraq and to return our troops home." It was clear that the party's stance on the war and its commitment to withdrawing troops were keys to the endorsement.

Election News

The Franklin Times -

Wallup National Poll (4/6/08)

If the election were held today, who would you support?

LLP - 13%;
LFP - 10%
FMP - 13%
ALP - 8%
FHSRP - 7%
JRP - 7%
FDRP - 17%
Unsure - 25%

The National Election Commission, with the approval of King Guy, has announced that Election Day will be moved back to May 11th. The NEC cited concerns about the availability of new voter machines for the delay.

A Foreign Gathering

The Capital Courier -

In Franklin City yesterday, four party spokespersons addressed a joint gathering of the Royal Veterans Association and the World Affairs Council. In speeches to the audience, the speakers laid out the foreign policies of their respective parties. Spokespersons from the LLP, FMP, FDRP, and the LFP detailed their foreign policy plans if they were to win the upcoming election. Reaction from the audience was polite but bitterly divided. "The LLP and the LFP both seem committed to seeing this country fail in Iraq. They both represent the politics of cut and run. The FMP seemed to take a moderate stance but offered few details. The FDRP is the only party seemingly firmly committed to victory in Iraq," explain Joel Smithson the RVA's Bennett State President. Yet, there was a radically different opinion from Susan Prompt, WAC Policy President. "From conversations I had after the presentations, my supporters were most impressed with the LLP's Gentry Plan. Their call for troop withdraw seems the most intouch with the will of the people. I would not be surprised to see our organization endorse the LLP in the coming week."

The Trade Issue

The Franklin Times -

The nation's two largest labor unions, the National Workers Union and the Franklin Workers Alliance, issued a joint statement today asking the parties to clearly state their policies as they relate to labor issues. "Today, we call on the political parties to explain their views on the rights of workers to form unions, have affordable healthcare, possess secure pensions, and a living wage," said Luke Hooper, spokesman for the NWU.

With unemployment rising and many working class voters feeling squeezed these issues are clearly important to union members. Tied to these economic concerns is the issue of free trade. NAFTA has been increasing blamed for rising unemployment in the large urban centers of the country. However, many farmers and high tech firms have benefited greatly from the free trade agreement. These groups have found support from the Free Market Association, which explains that the future of economic growth is found in free trade agreements not in protectionism.

Wallup Poll

The Capital Courier -

The Wallup Polling Corp. released it latest round of national polling...

If the election were held today, who would you support?
FMP - 10%, FHSRP - 8%, LFP - 8%, LLP - 7%, ALP - 6%, JRP - 5%, FDRP - 18%, Undecided - 38%

Do you feel well informed as to the Parties' policies?
Yes - 25%; No - 75%

Should the country boycott the Olympics?
Yes - 38%; No - 38%; Unsure - 24%

What is the most important issue in the election?
Economy - 41%; War on Terror/Iraq - 20%; Healthcare - 10%; Education - 10%; Other - 19%

Should the Franklin States withdraw from Iraq?
Yes - 64%; No - 36%

Should the Franklin States continue its membership in NAFTA?
Yes - 42%; No - 30%; Unsure - 28%

Do you consider yourself "pro-choice" or "pro-life"?
Pro-choice - 44%; Pro-life - 32%; Neither - 24%

The Future of Energy?

The Franklin Times -

Gas prices reached a new record high on Tuesday. The national average for a gallon of unleaded gasoline was $3.41. The price of gas was caused in part by rising oil prices on the global market. However, the energy question remains an open one as no party has yet proposed a comprehensive energy policy. After winning the 2007 election the FCP led coalition failed to pass a compromise energy policy through the National Assembly leaving the country directionless on the energy question. However, as consumers continually feel this economic pinch it is bound to grow in political importance.

What is the answer to the energy question? The answer may not be so clear...
http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1725975,00.html

Interests Groups Enter the Fray

The Capital Courier -

As the election heats up, political parties are not the only agents to consider. While the seven political parties competing in the 2008 election are new, the interest groups representing like minded citizens are not. All of the nationally recognized interest groups from the 2007 election have maintained their organization and are looking at the parties carefully. These interest groups, like in elections throughout the United States, can play a powerful role in the electoral process. These groups possess the ability to spend money on independent advertising, and energize their supporters to support one party over another. In the 2007 election there were intense battles for endorsements from these groups.

In related news, two interest groups (the World Affairs Council and the Royal Veterans Association) announced plans to hold a joint conference to discuss the global issues facing the nation. In a joint new conference, the spokesmen from both organizations invited the political parties to address the conference. Any party wishing to participate are asked to submit a five to ten minute speech outlining their visions for a future foreign policy on their webpages and submit a copy to the moderator of the event, NEC Director Mr. J. McFarland by Friday, April 4th.

The Olympic Question

The Capital Courier - (editorial)

As news of China's crackdown in Tibet and other provinces seeps out of that repressive nation; our leaders, our citizens, our nation as a whole must ask what to do. This summer, athletes from around the world will gather to compete on the international stage in the preeminent athletic competition. This international event which will pit the world's best against each other in the spirit of friendly and peaceful competition is something our nation's athletes have dreamed of for years. Yet, is there a higher moral purpose which we must consider?

Our nation has known tyrants and tyranny. Our nation has seen the impact of iron-fisted rule and the results of totalitarian goverance. Our nation is familiar with the policies of an uncaring world willing to look a blind eye at injustice. Yet, our nation has also witnessed the transforming nature of society when a people finally are allowed to rise up and overthrow their oppressors.

Nearly three years ago, our nation underwent such a transforming revolution. The end of the absolute monarchy, controlled by my family, allowed for a rebirth of individual freedom and introduced to our nation the miracle of democratic rule. Fellow citizens, we know this struggle and we know the proper end. The question we must ask is how can we influence the means?

It is because of our recent history and struggles, our first hand knowledge of the events now facing the Tibetans, that we have a unique responsibility. The Franklin States must take the high road. The Franklin States must show solidarity with our brothers and sisters in Tibet and elsewhere who desire freedom. Yet will we?

China represents a rising power in the East. She represents the fastest growing economic market in the world and would make a tremendous trading partner. Yet, we must look beyond this economic potential to what is right. The current U.S. administration, the very birthplace of modern democracy, continues to ignore the situation. We should not make the same mistake.

It is with these thoughts in mind that I call on the competing political parties in the upcoming election to join me in my call for a boycott of the upcoming Olympic Games to be held this summer in the Chinese capital, Beijing. Through such a boycott, our proud nation can send the message that we will not condone the military crackdown currently occurring in Western China, nor will we turn a blind eye to the half century of injustice committed against the Chinese people by their own government. We must stand on the side of freedom and not support the Chinese efforts to sweep their horrible human rights record under the rug.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23754052

Sincerely,
Your King and Sovereign
King Guy Plantagenet II

New Wallup Poll Shows Tighening Race

The Franklin Times -

The upcoming parliamentary elections are growing more competitive according to the most recent Wallup Election Poll.

If the election were held today, who would you support?

FMP - 7%; FHSRP - 6%; LFP - 7%; LLM - 8%; ALP - 7%; JRP - 5%; FDRP - 17%; Unsure - 43%

While the poll shows growing competition, there is still a massive number of voters who are undecided. When these undecided voters were questioned, many complained that the parties, while beginning to offer policies, were not distinguishing themselves. "I would love to see more debate between the parties over the future course of the country," explain Sarah Fale (an undecided voter). "The parties are not engaging each other in this election."

The NEC also announced that due to these poll results all recognized political parties qualified for the allocated $50 million in campaign funds. The NEC Director, James McFarland, announced that the first filing report for campaign expenditures would be due April 2nd.

Massive Iraq Protests Held

The Franklin Times -

The day before Easter Sunday was marked by massive anti-war protests throughout the nation, culminating in a 500,000 person strong rally in the capital. The protests was organized by a loose coalition of political organizations calling itself the Union for Change Now.

Adam Swan, spokesman for UCN expressed the goal of the marches, "It is time for the people of this nation to stand up and demonstrate their desire and need for change. Prime Minister Sexton continues a failed policy begun by the unelected tyrant before him. It is time for this nation and its brave men and women in uniform to leave Iraq. This was a war by choice driven by the United States. Our leaders need to urgently turn their attention to the problems at home and away from a problem created by a southern neighbor."

The massive protests clearly signify a growing restlessness over the war throughout much of the country. The UCN and its member clearly are looking to put political pressure on the parties competing in the upcoming election. Recent polls also seem to reveal that popular opinion is on the side of the UCN. In a recent Wallup national poll, 69% of respondents stated that the Royal Armed Forces should be withdrawn from Iraq. 65% of respondents also stated they disapprove of Prime Minister Sexton's current handling of this issue.

The Power of the Old?

The Capital Courier -

While the past government is not standing for reelection, it is clear that the government ministers are not going away. Prime Minister Brent Sexton, while offering a blistering attack on his critics, has announced his political organization is looking for a torchbearer.

Citing the great issues facing the nation, the Prime Minister stated, "It is important for our nation to continue on the road of security and economic prosperity. Therefore, it is essential for our nation to elect a government that will not tie the hands of business or our military commanders in Iraq. It is my intention to fully and actively support the party that best articulates these views."

The importance of the Free Conservative Party (which is disbanding as Sexton steps down after the April election) cannot be overstated. During the 2007 election, the FCP showed tremendous organizational talents and displayed an effective get-out-the-vote effort. Its and Prime Minister Sexton's popularity in the Western and Northern part of the country would be a great prize for any conservative party. "I would expect to see a rush by the conservative parties to woo the Prime Minister. His endorsement could be a trump card in this race," explained Allen Baldwin, Political Science Professor at Franklin National University. He added, "However, I don't expect the Prime Minister to rush to any sort of decision. He will wait to make an endorsement in an effort to make the maximum political impact."

Meanwhile, the political left is growing restless. After receiving more votes in the 2007 elections, but failing to control the government because of divisions between the leftist parties, the political left is anxious to win in 2008. Deputy Prime Minister and Liberal States Party Leader, Cameron McDaniel (who in past weeks has grown ever critical of the Prime Minister's policies) called for action from the new parties. McDaniel announced the formation of a new interest group, the National Progressive Union, dedicated to promoting and supporting left-of-center parties and candidates. "It is my hope that the NPU will bring an end to the current silence by the leftist parties. The workers of this nation deserve more than they are currently getting from the Sexton government," explained McDaniel. McDaniel went on to explain that unless a strong and effective voice emerged on the left, he would enter the race. This move would severely hurt any new leftist party as McDaniel would be able to capitalize on this NPU organization and combine the remaining elements of the Liberal States Party and the Liberal Rights Party, where he remains tremendously popular.

The Power of the Internet

The Franklin Times -

Fueled by an effective internet strategy the FDRP is growing in recogniztion and popularity. The most recent Wallup Poll (conducted Friday 3/14/08) finds that 50% of Franklin voters have heard of the FDRP. This number outperforms all other parties. The poll found that much of this attention and growing support is founded on the party's concerted effort to use the internet. "The FDRP website is continually updated and is clearly the most informative," said Wallup polling director, Eric Smith.

The NEC, which released $50 million dollars to the FDRP earlier in the week due to is polling results, is calling for a meeting with the FDRP leadership to explain spending rules. The meeting is expected to be held early next week.

The Wallup Poll found:

If the election were held today, who would you vote for?
FMP - 4%; FHSRP - 1%; LFP - 3%; LLP - 3%; ALP - 1%; JRP - 2%; FDRP - 17%; Unsure - 69%

First Wallup National Poll Released

The Franklin Times -

The Wallup polling service released their first national poll yesterday. The WPS poll showcased growing concern over the economy and frustration in the lack of political options. Many voters, who were questioned in the poll (sample size 2200) voiced little confidence in the overall health of the economy. When asked to rate their top election concern, 44% stated the economy. 23% stated that their top concern was the War in Iraq and the War on Terror. 11% identified raising healthcare costs as their number one concern.

Voters also complained about the silence from the parties over these issues. 85% of voters agreed that the parties need to do more to showcase their views. 60% of voters claimed to have read or heard nothing from any political party. Of those who had, the vast majority had acquired information about the FDRP. The FDRP is the only party so far to launch an information campaign. Further poll details are below.

If the election was held today, who would you vote for?
FMP 1%; FHSRP 1%; LFP 3%; LLP 3%; ALP 1%; JRP 1%; FDRP 10%; Unsure 80%

Would you like to know more about the parties?
Yes: 88%; No: 5%; Unsure 7%

Is the economy better today than it was a year ago?
Yes: 35%; No: 60%; Unsure: 5%

Do you approve of Prime Minister Sexton's job performance?
Yes: 38%; No: 47%; Unsure: 15%


Due to the poll results the National Election Commission announced the release of $50 million to the FDRP for the national campaign. In his statement, NEC Chairman James McFarland stated, "The FDRP has cleared the established threshold to receive the public campaign funds. As soon as other parties poll above 5% nationally additional funds will be released."

Socialist Victory in Spain

The Franklin Times -

Over the weekend, the Socialist government in Spain was reelected. The Socialist Party was the clear victor in the weekend elections, winning five more seats than in 2004. While the party is short of a majority, forming a coalition will probably offer little challenge to the party. Many analysts point to the results as a statement of support for the leftist policies of this party in a historically conservative country. What does this foretell for the Franklin States?

Please read for more information:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20080310/wl_nm/spain_election_dc;_ylt=AnTDDfpbyj7_lixL9lSygNh0bBAF

Bad Economic Times Ahead?

The Telmer Telegraph -

Government economic figures, released today, show the continuation of a negative trend: an increase in the unemployment rate. Unemployment jumped to 7.1%, an increase of nearly two percentage points in two months.

The report cites the continued "outsourcing" of jobs in the manufacturing sector as the main cause. Capital State and Schenck were hit the hardest, each with an current unemployment rate at 10.7%.

A number of leaders from the organized labor movement have already called on National Assembly candidates to make their trade and economic views clear. "We want to know, do these parties stand with the worker or the wealthy?" commented Alistar Campell, leader of the United Workers Union. Campell continued, "Prime Minister Sexton and his conservative economic policies have utterly failed to solve a dangerous trend for our nation. It is time for the Franklin States to chose a leader committed to fight for the middle class."

Death in Iraq

The Nordonia News -

The Royal Armed Forces announced the death of two soldiers south of Baghdad on Saturday. Both died in an IED attack while on patrol. The two soldiers are both from a unit stationed out of the State of Huron. The RAF's press release stated that their names will be released after contact is made with the families. The Royal Armed Forces currently has 2,300 military personnel deployed in Iraq in support of Coalition forces. These deaths mark the 59th and 60th military fatalities since 2003.

In his official statement, Prime Minister Sexton reconfirmed his commitment to the military operation in Iraq. "These two young soldiers gave the ultimate sacrifice to protect our nation and to secure the blessings of liberty for a people deprieved too long of democracy."

The deaths are sure to reopen the Iraq War as a compaign issue in the upcoming parliamentary elections. Prime Minister Sexton launched an attempt nearly a year ago to expand the military's commitment in Iraq but failed in a close vote in the National Assembly (161 for/189 against).

Election Time

The Franklin Times -

As the nation awaits the beginning of its second democratic election, the political parties prepare themselves for a long and spirited fight. King Guy, has renamed J. McFarland to be Director of the National Election Commission, which will oversee the election. Mr. McFarland has issued seven political party notices and plans to release their official names by Monday, March 10th.

Three parties have already responded to the electoral notices. These parties have submitted leadership lists along with the required paperwork, qualifying their entry on the national ballot. These parties are: the LLP, the JRP, and the FDRP.

These parties are free to begin campaigning and will qualify for national election funds once they poll at least 5% in a national opinion poll. The Wallup News Service announced Friday their first poll will be conducted over the weekend and released early next week.

First National Poll

The Capital Courier -

The election has not even begun and the first poll is out! The Wallup Polling Institute has just released its first poll in the 2008 election. The Poll of 2200 registered voters asked the following questions:

1. Do you plan to vote in the upcoming democratic election?
Yes - 86%; No - 10%; Unsure - 4%

2. How would you describe your political ideology?
Very Liberal - 20%; Liberal - 15%; Moderate - 17%; Conservative - 30%; Very Conservative - 10%; Unsure - 8%

3. What is the most important issue for you today?
Economy - 40%; National Security/Iraq - 22%; Health Care - 10%; Unsure - 28%

4. Do you approve of the leadership of Prime Minister Sexton?

Strongly Approve: 30%; Approve: 10%; Strong Disapprove: 30%; Disapprove 10%; Unsure: 20%

Election Date Set

Prime Minister Sets Election Date

Prime Minister Brent Sexton has announced that the 2nd General Assembly Elections will be held nationally on April 20th, 2008. In his formal declaration, Prime Minister Sexton also announced that he would not stand for reelection and his ruling Free Conservative Party would also disband and reorganize for the upcoming election.

It appears the remaining six recognized parties will follow in like manner. This means that Franklin's 2nd democratic election will see new parties and political leadership compete for control of the national legislature.

In his message, Prime Minister Sexton announced that the National Election Commission would issue deadlines for formal party recognition after the first of the year.

With the current political parties disbanding there is little certainty what shape the political campaign will take.