Sunday, March 1, 2009

The War America Gave Mexico

Los Angeles Times
Tim Rutten
February 28, 2009

Early in the last century, near the end of his 34 bloody years in power, the aging Mexican strongman Porfirio Diaz mused that his country's great misfortune was to be located "so far from God and so near the United States."

The shrewd old thief's observation came to mind this week when U.S. officials announced they'd joined with Mexican authorities in arresting more than 730 people allegedly linked to the Sinaloa drug cartel. That gang is the most powerful of the numerous criminal organizations smuggling drugs into the United States. Their intramural quarrels and resistance to a government crackdown have plunged Mexico into a round of violence unseen since the Cristero Wars in the 1920s. Over the last year, about 6,000 Mexicans have been killed.

Many fear that Mexico could be sliding into civil instability because of the cartels' increasing willingness to use violence and bribery to protect their business. It's an old story in other parts of Latin America, and for that reason, three of the region's former heads of state -- including onetime Mexican President Ernesto Zedillo -- recently issued a report urging the U.S. to consider legalizing at least marijuana. Fat chance.

Similarly, at a news conference this week, Atty. Gen. Eric H. Holder Jr. set off a firestorm when he mentioned in passing that the U.S. should consider restoring its ban on the sale of military-style assault weapons. That prohibition, adopted in 1994, contained a clause requiring Congress to renew the ban after 10 years. To nobody's surprise, Congress didn't, and now assault weapons, semiautomatic pistols and .50-caliber rifles that are illegal in Mexico flow into the hands of the drug traffickers there from an estimated 6,000 American gun dealers in Texas, New Mexico, Arizona and California.

Thus, America's political decisions to treat drug addiction as a crime rather than a public health problem, and to legalize AK-47s but not pot, fuel an incipient civil war in Mexico.

Mexico is a complex country with a resourceful and creative people. It also is -- like other Latin American nations ravaged by the drug trade -- burdened with a stunted civil society, chronic maldistribution of wealth, ingrained corruption and endemic political violence. These pathologies have made it painfully susceptible to the social and economic distortions created by America's seemingly insatiable desire for drugs.

For a country as proud of its cultural autonomy as Mexico traditionally has been, one of the bitter ironies must be the way in which the pseudo-romantic culture of drug trafficking has commandeered so much of the nation's popular imagination. In the cities of Mexico's northern and western states, traffickers and wannabe narcos mimic the dress and tattoos of Los Angeles' street gangs.

One of Mexico's most ubiquitous popular music genres is the narco-corrido, ballads built on traditional norteƱo dance music but with lyrics that romanticize the drug trade. It's a brand of music born in the cantinas, dance clubs and swap meets of L.A. and the Coachella Valley, in large part because of a gifted young composer named Rosalino "Chalino" Sanchez.

He was born on a ranch in Sinaloa, an epicenter of Mexico's drug trade, and had to flee as an illegal immigrant to California after killing a local drug trafficker who had raped his sister. Initially, he worked the Coachella fields, but soon found a place in Southern California's thriving underground Mexican music scene.

Sometimes, Sanchez simply set down the stories he heard from the dealers and smugglers in the bars and at the swap meets; sometimes, he worked on commissions from the narcos themselves, minor criminals who saw a chance for cassette-based immortality. In 1992, he returnedto Sinaloa for a concert and wasmurdered execution-style. His killers never were found, but his narcocorridos spawned an army of imitators.

Sanchez's strange and tragic story is a metaphor for the destructive symbiosis in which the U.S. and Mexico find themselves. As Times reporter Sam Quinones, who profiled Sanchez for his book, "True Tales From Another Mexico," puts it, "Los Angeles is Mexico's culture factory."

Mexico's drug war could escalate into widespread civil strife with incalculable consequences for the U.S. -- and, particularly, the Southwest. And we're kidding ourselves if we insist that this is a problem that can be wholly solved south of the border, or quarantined there if events spiral out of control. It's impossible to know how close either the United States or Mexico is to God, but geographically, culturally and economically, they've never been closer to one another.

If Americans really are concerned about the horrific toll inflicted by Mexico's narco-gangsters, we need to ask some tough questions about our own cultural and political delusions.

timothy.rutten@latimes.com

5 comments:

Anonymous said...

The TPP opposes the sale of any military style assault weapons to the public. These types of weapons are made for the military, not the average citizen, whom many are not trained to use such weapons. Assault rifles are made to kill people and have no use in our country other than for military purposes.

Anonymous said...

The MP does support the use of American assistance to deal with the drug situation in Mexico. Many Americans frequent Mexico, and the MP is always fighting for the safety of its citizens. Also the use of American forces in Mexico will help decrease the amount of illeal marijuana smuggled into the Franklin States. The MP does recognize that citizens have the right to bear arms, but not to the extent in which this article describes. Military weapons are meant for military purposes only, and have no use in daily life.

Anonymous said...

In dealing with Mexico, the U.S. needs to, put frankly, crap or get off the pot. Legalizing marijuana will only make things worse. America must take this threat seriously. Their citizens should be armed in order to defend themselves from these drug cartels should the need arise. Unfortunately for everyone, the U.S. has an administration that is only taking half-steps to solve this problem. Their Attorney General issues empty rhetoric and their Homeland Security Secretary refused to talk about the situation. America: Do something!

Anonymous said...

Scott:
Normal citizens should never take law into their own hands. There is a reason that countries have police and military forces.

Anonymous said...

I did not mean that citizens should take the law into their own hands. I meant that people should have the right and ability to defend themselves if their homes or families are threatened. This doesn't mean that you can drive across town with your gun, pop off a few shots, and go home. It means if your home is invaded by someone, you should have access to a firearm in order to defend yourself and family.