Tuesday, January 27, 2009

Afghanistan: Our Problem?


The Franklin Times -

As the conflict in Afghanistan enters its eighth year it is becoming clearer and clearer that the western world is failing. One would be hard pressed to look at this war-torn nation and conclude that progress is being made or that it is even possible. This is a land that has defeated every foreign force that has tried to control or change it.

It is a land governed by religious extremism, tribalism, warlords, and drug smugglers. Since bringing Karzai to power after the fall of the Taliban government, the United States has been unable to extend his power. Many analysts agree that while President of Afghanistan in name, Karzai's true power does not extend outside the capital of Kabul.

In complicate matters, the Taliban has reemerged. Supported by sympathetic Pashtuns in Pakistan's ungovernable frontier, this religious movement has reasserted its control over much of the countryside and drug trade. This has led to increasing violence throughout the country and has threatened to prevent the creation of a stable Afghanistan.

In response to these changing dynamics, the United States is reevaluating its military strategy in the country. President Obama and Defense Sec. Gates are looking to expand the military operation and increase the number of troops in country. NATO, which officially has military command of all international forces, is growing wary of the extended military involvement.

So, now the question for our nation is straightforward: does Franklin commit military forces to Afghanistan?

AP - Gates testifies before Congress

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

One thing is certain—the world faces danger from terrorists. But when considering adding The Franklin States of America's military strength to the U.S. troops already there, we must ask ourselves these questions:

-How many troops are available to send?
-How would this affect our national protection?
-Would our military contribution affect what is already going on, if there is less stability than ever in Afghanistan?
-Would sending troops or not sending affect our relationship with America, as well as the rest of the world?

The Fanatical Party is open to all options. We know there are pro’s and con’s to each side. But remember, without fuel to add to the flames, a fire will eventually go out.

Taylor Jeromos, Fanatical Party Leader and Spokesperson, to the citizens of The Frankin States of America

Megan Webb said...

The MP does realize there is a very real threat of terrorism to the FSA, as in any nation. The MP does not see with the current economic downfall the ability to assist the U.S. trrops. The MP does not see the avaibility of troops, but if eminent danger would occur to the FSA or its allies the MP would be willing to change its plans at that time.